For years, I let someone else write my story.
Saturday, March 7, 2026
My Truth Doesn't Belong to You
Monday, December 29, 2025
Special Inquiry Judges
Special Inquiry Judges
I recently learned Washington has a confidential legal tool that lets a prosecutor gather evidence under a judge’s supervision without doing it in public view: the Special Inquiry Judge process under RCW 10.27. Think of it less as a “trial” and more as a judge-supervised, subpoena-driven fact-finding proceeding. The SIJ doesn’t decide guilt, doesn’t hand down a verdict, and—by statute—can’t later preside over the criminal case that grows out of the inquiry.
Washington law requires every county to have a Superior Court judge available to serve in this role, designated by a majority of the judges. So this isn’t a conspiracy theory “black site.” It’s a lawful mechanism—quiet, formal, and mostly invisible unless you’re pulled into it.
Here’s the basic structure as I understand it:
- Police investigate first, then the case may be referred to the prosecutor.
- The prosecutor (called the “public attorney” in the statute) can initiate an SIJ proceeding.
- Once it exists, the prosecutor can subpoena records and compel witness testimony, under judicial supervision.
- When testimony is taken, the room is kept tight: the witness (and counsel), the prosecutor, the court reporter, and a few limited necessary roles. The point is confidentiality.
And yes—this is where the whole thing gets queasy.
People hear “you can plead the Fifth” and assume that ends the conversation. In an SIJ setting, the privilege against self-incrimination still exists, but the prosecutor can ask the judge to order the witness to answer anyway, and the statute provides immunity-type protection for compelled testimony while still allowing punishment for perjury or refusal to comply. Translation: the system has a built-in way to trade your silence for compelled answers.
What’s even more unsettling is the secrecy. The subject of an investigation might not be told it’s happening. Friends, coworkers, or family can be questioned under strict confidentiality rules. That’s not automatically evil—it’s how investigations work—but it’s also how false narratives can metastasize in the dark. When questions are asked in secret, the way they’re phrased matters. A leading question doesn’t just “gather facts”—it plants an idea.
“Have you ever seen Shannon do anything that might be considered terrorism?”
That question is a stink bomb. Even if the answer is “absolutely not,” you’ve still put the word terrorism in someone’s head next to my name. And if the person you’re asking has a grudge, an axe to grind, or just enjoys being important for five minutes, the incentive to embellish is obvious.
And then there’s the human factor nobody wants to talk about: what happens when the prosecutor gets emotionally invested? What happens when the narrative becomes the goal? Who checks the instinct to ignore exculpatory facts because they’re inconvenient? Who stops the “we didn’t prove that, but we noticed this” drift—where the original suspicion collapses and the fallback plan becomes scraping for unrelated offenses?
At what point does the system admit it has spent enough time and resources grinding a private citizen into dust—isolating them, destabilizing their work and relationships, and wrecking their health—without producing the supposed monster it went hunting for?
Great question. If I ever get a straight answer, I’ll publish it. Until then, I’ll be over here living in the kind of atmosphere where privacy is treated like a privilege, suspicion is treated like proof, and indignation is treated like guilt—especially once you stop using polite words when addressing your watchers.
Thursday, December 18, 2025
Walk of Blame
How One Woman's Prejudice Keeps An Innocent Man On Lockdown
In a recent briefing between investigators and an Assistant US Attorney where the topic was whether or not to continue a 3-year investigation of me for terrorism, a lone investigator fought tirelessly to stand up for my rights and to show that the claims that were made against me were baseless and fictional. But he was up against a beast of a woman who oversees this never-ending invasion of my privacy, who happens to be unreasonably prejudiced against me and has no sympathy for the damage her team has caused to me, my relationships, and my mental and physical health. She is of the opinion that I am simply displaying my renowned patience, that I am waiting them out so I can get back to terrorist stuff as soon as they give up and move along back to wherever assholes and US Attorneys go when they aren’t destroying innocent lives.
Just when I thought the male investigator had her cornered with logic and facts and was prepared to hear her finally relent, she raised the most ludicrous reason I have ever heard to continue the investigation. She said that I had become unpredictable, that I had started taking walks around the neighborhood late at night, and that this was an indication that continued surveillance was required. Her reasoning? That I am not a walker. That walking is not something I normally do.
I don’t know if it’s merely a matter of needing to nail down an arrest in order to justify the enormous amount of money wasted on investigating me for crimes I never committed, or if I’ve become her own personal white wale, but this person in a seat of power over a team of investigators is ignoring facts that are irrefutable and exculpatory in favor of hammering out an arrest warrant and seeing me cuffed and sent to a federal penitentiary. Forget about “innocent until proven guilty.” This woman decided three years ago that I was 100% guilty, and nothing is going to change her mind about it.
Saturday, November 29, 2025
Dangerous Ignorance In The City Attorney's Office
Seattle City Attorney, Ann Davison, doesn't know the difference between HIV negative and undetectable. Normally, I'd say, "So what. Plenty of people are surprisingly ignorant when it comes to HIV terminology. But an elected official in such a seat of power who chooses to conduct investigations on innocent people over an angry and misguided tip from someone claiming (falsely) that he had been intentionally infected by a friend who he said was supposed to be negative, is a danger to any citizen of this city living with HIV.
In case she reads this post, allow me to illustrate the difference, because the distinction matters immensely.
A person is HIV negative if they have never been infected with the virus. This means there are no virus copies anywhere in their system, and there never has been. These people have the option of taking Truvada or other medications once daily to prevent HIV infection through sex.
![]() |
| HIV attaching to a lymphocyte |
The virus isn't gone. The few copies that remain travel into the nooks and crannies, mostly inside lymph nodes, and become dormant. They lie there in wait for an opportunity when the medicine is no longer around to suppress it, sleeping until they can wake and resume making copies of themselves using helper T-cells from our immune system as the building blocks. This is why adherence is critical and why remaining undetectable has always been my goal.
The CDC considers an undetectable status, meaning there are fewer than 40 copies of the virus per mL of blood, to be untransmittable. This is the basis of the U=U campaign aimed at educating people like Ann Davison so they understand risk factors accurately.I have been HIV positive since 1993. For the vast majority of those years, I have remained durably suppressed or undetectable - same thing. Since day one, I have been upfront about my status with every partner I've had, despite the rejection and stigma that accompanies such an admission. It's in all my profiles on Grindr, Scruff, and Sniffies. I have never hidden my status. Not ever. As is the case with any long-term survivor of HIV, there are occasional "blips" where viral load spikes unexpectedly above the level of detection. It happens through no fault of the patient. This is what happened to me in the fall of 2023.
![]() |
| A white blood cell infected with HIV |
That year in September, I got a viral load that was "detectable" at 63 copies per milliliter of blood. This is still considered to be durably suppressed. The CDC and WHO consider any viral load below 1,000 to carry a risk of transmissibility effectively negligible.
63 < 1,000. Do the math, Ann.
their privacy day and night, holding embarrassing conversations about the subject's weight, hygiene, eating habits, and masturbation schedule, at least know which people among your constituents present a credible risk of spreading HIV. Because when you get that basic factor wrong, your whole basis for an investigation goes right out the window.But you don't let a little thing like that stop you, do you, Ann? Even when your own investigator reads you a list of reasons to call off the investigation and leave me alone, you shut him down, reminding him he is a City Employee and as such will do whatever you tell him to do. Not very good managerial style, but hey. You do you.
I guess if it's no longer about whether your pal (my former friend turned ridiculous enemy) actually became positive through my intentional transmission, then I guess it must be a personal grudge now. I imagine it must be pretty humiliating to realize partway through an investigation that your target is medically incapable of the crime you are trying to pin on him. Add to that the bonus of the subject catching on to your game and listening to your investigators talking about him from their hiding place nearby. That's got to be salt in an already embarrassing wound. So you direct them to keep monitoring and to find probable cause sufficient to get a warrant and arrest me. Disregard the protests of the man on the ground who has seen firsthand my innocence. What does the truth matter when you've got a crusade to finish?
I suppose this is why Seattle PD's records department can't seem to fulfill my public records requests in a more timely manner. I have requested records of police reports, body worn video, dash camera footage, investigation notes and basically any artifact available in connection with me going back as far as April 2024 that still have not been fulfilled. The first bunch was held so long that some of the records met their retention deadline and were deleted despite my open request for them. Did you make a call and instruct those city employees to drag their feet as long as they could? I guess we'll see, won't we. Another batch of released files is due 12/31/25.I can't wait until I have an opportunity to face you in court and look at your face when I show the judge my hard, unimpeachable evidence of my durable suppression since 2020 right on up through this past Tuesday. I'm envisioning your head exploding or at least plumes of cartoon steam gushing forth from your ears. Keep it up, Ann. But try to learn something along the way, ma'am. It's kind of your job to know this shit.Sunday, November 23, 2025
HIV & Depression
How Long-Term HIV Survival and Depressive Episodes Go Hand-In-Hand
That’s what scares me when I finally surface: how easily survival can start to unravel in those stretches. If I miss meds for long enough, HIV stops behaving like a managed chronic condition and starts becoming a real threat again. The virus I work so hard to keep caged gets a chance to wake back up. Then the shame hits: You know better. How could you let this slide? That shame folds right back into the depression, which makes it even harder to pick the pill up the next day. It becomes a loop—virus, pill, depression, avoidance, more risk—and it’s terrifying to realize how quickly that loop could become deadly if it goes unchecked.
At The Precipice Once More
LOOK OUT FOR THAT FIRST STEP. IT'S A LULU!
I'm really trying hard to have a more positive outlook. Truly! But I can't seem to stop tripping over huge reminders that taking two steps forward will ultimately land you three steps back. It's like just when one awful thing resolves itself, there's no time to even celebrate that small win before its mutant cousin pops up with a chip on its shoulder looking to double the awful you just finished tidying up.
A major development in my ongoing saga of the mysterious "investigation" that has haunted me for the last two-and-a-half years finally came to fruition this past
weekend, and there are two ways of looking at it. Either these nosey nellies calling themselves "investigators" finally did some elementary investigating and uncovered the truth, which, surprisingly, they shared with a certain former friend whose raison d'etre for the last couple years has been to shout "Shannon's a murderer!" from the mountain tops. The alternative view, and the one I'm actually inclined to believe, is that he and his gal pals got creative and put on one of their now famous scripted performances wherein the former friend gives a stellar performance as a decent human being just long enough for me to swallow the act and buy into the ruse.
Not this time! Fool me thrice, and . . . well, shove it where the sun don't shine, I guess. Trust is a resource I now guard more tightly than China on rare earths. He killed off my former default setting, which was to trust people completely until they give you a reason not to. Ah, but it's for the best really. There are just way too many people around who look for simps like that and suck 'em dry before they use up that free trust and then bounce. I'm done with those guys.
Either way, it represents a milestone for me, and it felt like a huge weight was about to be lifted. I could actually feel myself ready to rise, to lift off and glide toward a better future. Nah-ah! No, sir. Get your fat ass back down here in the dirt! Pigs don't fly, big boy!
Because this troupe of assholes, er. um, actors playing at investigating are incapable of talking to one another at a volume lower than 120 decibels, especially when the whole gang is on speaker phone or Zoom, I got to hear the universe winding up for the next kick to my nuts. I might have been cleared by these jokers of having ever been a murderer or a terrorist, but because they have been invading my privacy for going on three years now, they've managed to make a list of lesser gripes that the Head Cunt in Charge seems intent on pinning on me with a warrant, even though this bitch and her chums are personally responsible for irreparable damage to my life and for the loss of what was a very important relationship for me.
Bitch has zero empathy and no sense of shame at all. A decent person, upon learning they were completely wrong about something so terrible would reflect on their actions and the impact they had on their target during the course of their mishandled blunder of an investigation and think, "Hmm. I fucked up, and this guy was really hurt in the process. That's on me, and I'm gonna leave this dude the fuck alone. He's earned a break, surviving me and my around-the-clock surveillance as well as he did." And then they would tuck their tail between their legs and shuffle off quietly into the sunset. Not HCiC. She see's her errors as inconsequential and focuses on saving face instead of giving grace. Her priority is to find something, anything that will justify the HUGE expense she's racked up with her fruitless and baseless three-year crusade to catch a killer that never existed. What a fucking bitch.
Even her fellow investigators were taken aback by her gall. One dude, who I actually think is pretty cool, stood up to the twat for a good many hours yesterday, arguing from a place of accountability and sympathy that there was no way in hell there should even be a discussion about sending me to jail after what they did to my life. He's right!
I just started my work study job last week, and the drama going on all around me is putting me in very real danger of losing my financial aid. I'm taking three classes this quarter, and I'm on a collision course with utter failure in at least two of them, because I've been so consumed trying to figure out if and when these assholes are going to come for me. If I fail even one, my financial aid gets pulled for next quarter, which means I can't attend school or work study. If I don't attend school, I have to start repaying student loans, without which I can't pay rent. Without school, I no longer qualify for SNAP food benefits. Without those, I don't eat. It's like I said, two steps forward. . .here they come.
But, nah. Fuck them. I gave my friend all my support, my love, my loyalty, and in return I earned his betrayal, his lies, and his crusade to punish me for embarrassing him. I did everything I could to protect him, and he wants me in jail for failing to do that. It's so fucked up! He wants an apology I have not been given an opportunity to give him, and because it's so late coming his way, he's beyond angry. He's nuclear. He's lost all reason. There is no getting through his wall of hatred to his gooey Tootsie-roll center. He's lost to me, and in becoming so lost, has become a danger to me.
Monday, November 3, 2025
His Obsession With Me Is Absurd
From The Shadows A Coward Watches
![]() |
| AI-generated Illustration of my stalker harassing me from the shadows. |

.gif)











.png)
.png)





